Incoming materials
Critical films, adhesives, inks, circuits and components are identified from the BOM.
Evidence matched to the approved product
Quality Planning & Testing
Quality planning begins with measurable drawing requirements and a defined inspection method. Visual, dimensional, electrical and functional checks are selected for the approved component; certificates and reports remain linked to the actual holder and tested item.
Engineering variables
Quality evidence to define
In-process controls
Printing, registration, lamination, die cutting and assembly checkpoints are defined.
Final inspection
Appearance, dimensions, circuit continuity and project-specific functions are checked.
Traceability
Drawing revision, lot information and retained evidence are matched to the agreed scope.
Decision matrix
What makes a membrane-switch inspection result useful?
A useful quality plan names the approved product revision, characteristic, specimen, method, equipment, sampling or coverage, acceptance limit and record owner before inspection begins. Results apply only to the identified item and conditions; component evidence does not establish finished-equipment certification or system validation.
| Decision factor | Quality-plan definition | Evidence returned |
|---|---|---|
| Product and revision identity | Identify the approved drawing, artwork, BOM or controlled construction, part and revision, project stage, lot or sample identity, and every accepted deviation before inspection begins. | Tie the inspection record to the exact source item, revision, lot and specimen. An unapproved substitution, superseded file or unidentified sample cannot support acceptance of the released product. |
| Critical characteristics and limits | Name visual zones, dimensions and tolerances, print registration, key feel or functional states, circuit and connector checks, plus every customer-designated critical item. Give each characteristic a measurable limit or an agreed judgement method. | Return a check plan that separates measured values from visual and functional judgements, then records pass, fail or conditional status with unresolved items visible rather than converted into a general quality claim. |
| Sampling and coverage | Define the lot, inspection unit, characteristic risk, destructive or non-destructive method, sample selection, size and acceptance or rejection rule, or identify the characteristic that requires 100% coverage. | State the inspected population, selected sample or coverage and resulting lot disposition. There is no universal AQL, sample size or switching rule that truthfully fits every product, characteristic and customer risk. |
| Measurement and equipment | Define the method, fixture, equipment range and resolution, calibration or verification status, environment and operator information needed for the characteristic and tolerance. | Record the method, equipment identity and status, date and any relevant uncertainty or limitation. Out-of-range, expired, unsuitable or unidentified measurement evidence cannot prove acceptance. |
| Electrical, functional and assembly checks | Provide the circuit map or pinout, applied electrical conditions and sequence, connector mating definition, enclosure and mounting condition, lighting or indicator logic, and the expected control behaviour. | Tie continuity, functional and installed-assembly results to the named specimen and test conditions. These component results do not prove system electrical safety, EMC, enclosure performance or complete-equipment compliance. |
| Special validation, traceability and release | Name any customer or industry test method, conditioning, sequence, duration, specimen count, acceptance criterion, report format, traceability, change-notification rule and approval owner. | Issue a report that identifies the sample revision, method, actual results, deviations, disposition and decision owner. Do not generalize the result beyond the tested method, assembly, revision and stated conditions. |
The ISO references below provide sampling, measurement-management and laboratory-competence context only. They do not prove that HYR, the parent company, a test provider or a proposed product is certified or accredited, or that a component result establishes finished-equipment compliance.
Real product evidence
Visual inspection resource
Real quality resource provided by Shenzhen Baoshengda Technology Co., Ltd., the parent company of HYR FLEX.
Representative product resource · project construction is confirmed from the approved drawing.Documents you can verify
Parent-company quality-system certificates.
Certificate holder: Shenzhen Baoshengda Technology Co., Ltd.. These certificates belong to the parent company, not to HYR FLEX or Shenzhen Huayangrun Technology Co., Ltd.
CEPREI Certification Body
ISO 9001:2015
- Certificate number
- 01226Q00358R001
- Scope
- Manufacturing of membrane switch and overlay
- Issued / expires
- 31 August 2026 / 30 August 2029
- Verification record
- Issuer lookup showed valid on 7 September 2026.
The stated scope is manufacturing; this is not product certification.
CEPREI Certification Body
IATF 16949:2016
- Certificate number
- 0612701 · CEPREI: 012IATF00271R099
- Scope
- Manufacture of Thin-Film Panel
- Issued / expires
- 26 August 2026 / 25 August 2029
- Verification record
- Issuer lookup showed valid on 7 September 2026.
Exclusions: Product Design. IATF USI: 3M6E49.
Covered manufacturing site: North plant, 2/F, Building A2, Yijing Industrial Park, No. 3055 Songbai Road, Tianliao Community, Gongming Street, Guangming New District, Shenzhen, Guangdong, China.
Continuing validity depends on satisfactory surveillance audits. Recheck the issuer record for supplier approval. Management-system certification does not establish product performance, an IP rating, medical-device approval or conformity of an OEM's finished equipment. The CNAS mark on the ISO certificate concerns the certification body's accreditation, not a claim that HYR operates a CNAS-accredited laboratory.
Request a project-specific supplier evidence pack ↗Before the RFQ
Questions that keep the first review useful.
Start with the evidence you have now. Open items stay visible for engineering follow-up instead of becoming silent quotation assumptions.
Is there one standard sample size or AQL for every project?
No. The sampling basis must match the defined lot, characteristic, inspection method, consequence of nonconformity and customer agreement. Some characteristics can use an agreed acceptance-sampling plan; others may require 100% inspection, a destructive sample or a separate validation activity.
Does a material certificate prove the finished membrane switch?
No. A certificate or report supports only its named holder, material, lot, method, result, validity and scope. The assembled membrane switch still needs evidence tied to its controlled construction and the characteristics the customer intends to accept.
Can component testing prove the customer’s equipment is compliant?
No. Membrane-switch evidence can support the identified component and installed checks, but system electrical safety, EMC, enclosure performance, software behaviour, regulatory approval and finished-equipment validation remain with the OEM unless responsibilities and evidence are separately defined.
A useful fit when
Start here if the project has these conditions.
- OEM drawing-controlled components
- Projects with named inspection or documentation needs
- Repeat orders requiring change visibility
Limits to resolve
Do not treat a product page as a final specification.
- No universal inspection plan fits every construction
- System-level certification remains outside component inspection
- Certificate validity and scope must be confirmed before publication
Prepare the RFQ
What to send for a useful review
You can submit what is available now. Unknown items remain visible for human follow-up rather than being guessed.
- 01
Critical-to-quality characteristics
- 02
Required inspection method or report
- 03
Sampling or traceability expectation
- 04
Customer acceptance criteria
Evidence boundary
Claims follow the approved drawing and the actual evidence holder.
Only verified, in-scope records are used. Parent-company certificates are shown as parent-company evidence and never relabelled as HYR certificates.
Technical reference basis
Sources inform the questions. The project drawing controls the answer.
These publisher resources support the decision framework. They do not prove that HYR uses a named grade, holds a listed certification or has approved a project construction.
- International Organization for StandardizationISO 2859-1:2026 — Sampling procedures for inspection by attributes ↗Publication date not stated
Official context for AQL-indexed lot-by-lot acceptance-sampling schemes; not evidence that one plan applies to every HYR project or that any proposed lot has been accepted.
- International Organization for StandardizationISO 10012:2026 — Requirements for measurement management systems ↗Publication date not stated
Official context for confidence in measurement processes and results; not evidence that HYR operates a certified measurement management system or that project measurements are valid without their own records.
- International Organization for StandardizationISO/IEC 17025:2017 — Competence of testing and calibration laboratories ↗Publication date not stated
Official laboratory-competence and accreditation context; not evidence that HYR, its parent company or a proposed test provider is accredited, or that a named report is within an accredited scope.